Transfer is harder than repeating a model
Copying a sentence with one noun changed is a useful first variation, but it keeps most of the original cues. A stronger transfer task preserves the communicative Move while changing more of the surface: different topic, different vocabulary, perhaps a different register.
The learner must decide whether the Frame still fits and adapt its open slots without violating the constraints that made the construction natural.
The Frame is the candidate for reuse
Metkagram separates the Frame from its examples so there is a stable object to carry forward. Examples show how the structure behaves; the Frame records what should remain reusable. A Move adds a second anchor by preserving the communication job even when the wording changes.
This lets practice ask a better question than “remember the sentence”: perform the same Move in a new situation and choose a Frame that still works.
Failed transfer is valuable evidence
If the learner cannot reuse a Frame, the failure can reveal several problems. The abstraction may be too broad, a hidden grammatical constraint may be missing, the new context may require another register, or the learner may know the structure only by recognition.
That makes transfer tasks useful for both learning and content quality. A Frame that repeatedly collapses outside its original examples deserves editorial attention rather than more motivational copy.